Supreme Court Criticizes Freebie Promises Before Elections

The Supreme Court has criticized the practice of offering freebies before elections, stating that such announcements are not appropriate. The court expressed its disapproval of this approach, arguing that free ration and cash handouts are discouraging people from working.

The apex court questioned political parties over their freebie promises and emphasized the need for public participation in the country's development. The court highlighted that citizens should have a greater role in society and not rely solely on government handouts.

Attorney General R. Venkataramani, representing the government, stated that several programs are being implemented to eradicate urban poverty. He mentioned the construction of shelters for the homeless as part of these efforts. The Supreme Court asked the Attorney General to inquire with the central government about when the urban poverty eradication scheme was launched.

A bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih made these remarks while hearing a petition related to shelter homes. Justice Gavai pointed out that people are receiving free ration and money without working. While appreciating the concern for the public, he stressed that people should not be discouraged from working.

The court has scheduled the next hearing on the case for six weeks later.